Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 21:54:12 GMT 12
The fact that the price of cinema tickets continues to rise is beyond the scope of itself. How did they even think of setting the price of tickets at the level of $10-15 per ticket? Do they think that this will actually increase the number of people who will go to the cinema instead of renting the movie online later or waiting for it to be put on torrents? Instead of lowering prices, They raise them, arguing that the newfangled "bells and whistles" like 3D and IMA physically going to the movies, getting to the cinema, already costs money. Going to a store and buying a DVD instead of renting online or downloading from a torrent tracker makes practical sense only if you really like "that's that movie" or you're a collector. The main problem that movie studios need to understand is to realize that everything they charge buyers for is grossly overpriced.
Whenever understand pay you $10 for the concept of a service that would suit the majority Europe Mobile Number List of modern moviegoers and just viewers in terms of legal online distribution of movies, it is a service somewhat similar to steam, only for movies. You can easily rent or download your favorite or new movies that you like according to the description. You can create a library "in the cloud" from these movies and synchronized to be a pirate and steal something from torrents: Open Steam for Me of films is still limited. And they want you to buy a Blu-Ray disc for $30, supposedly to watch the movie on several digital devices. How about having the author the latest and watch it and wherever you want,
Your customer can just go and download the movie anywhere and absolutely free (albeit illegally) and they give you credit by already making the decision to pay for the movie, to do it legally. And you still have the nerve to believe that consumers should do it on your terms? The agreement between the service and the user in this area does not work like that. And let it be wrong, but this is how the mechanism of "piracy - anti-piracy" is arranged, Companies need to recognize it. Instead, movie bosses are trying to condemn services like Netflix for undercharging them for access to legal content. "Steam for cinema", digital distribution, unt Steam” and a bunch of other "steams." And another aspect is relatively low prices. And it is completely impossible to force them to give up some ridiculous DRM-protection technology, Without any discs?
Whenever understand pay you $10 for the concept of a service that would suit the majority Europe Mobile Number List of modern moviegoers and just viewers in terms of legal online distribution of movies, it is a service somewhat similar to steam, only for movies. You can easily rent or download your favorite or new movies that you like according to the description. You can create a library "in the cloud" from these movies and synchronized to be a pirate and steal something from torrents: Open Steam for Me of films is still limited. And they want you to buy a Blu-Ray disc for $30, supposedly to watch the movie on several digital devices. How about having the author the latest and watch it and wherever you want,
Your customer can just go and download the movie anywhere and absolutely free (albeit illegally) and they give you credit by already making the decision to pay for the movie, to do it legally. And you still have the nerve to believe that consumers should do it on your terms? The agreement between the service and the user in this area does not work like that. And let it be wrong, but this is how the mechanism of "piracy - anti-piracy" is arranged, Companies need to recognize it. Instead, movie bosses are trying to condemn services like Netflix for undercharging them for access to legal content. "Steam for cinema", digital distribution, unt Steam” and a bunch of other "steams." And another aspect is relatively low prices. And it is completely impossible to force them to give up some ridiculous DRM-protection technology, Without any discs?